🔒
There are new articles available, click to refresh the page.
Before yesterdayZecOps Blog

SMBleedingGhost Writeup Part II: Unauthenticated Memory Read – Preparing the Ground for an RCE

15 June 2020 at 17:06
SMBleedingGhost Writeup Part II: Unauthenticated Memory Read – Preparing the Ground for an RCE

Introduction

In our previous blog post, we demonstrated how the SMBGhost bug (CVE-2020-0796) can be exploited for local privilege escalation. A brief reminder: CVE-2020-0796, also known as “SMBGhost”, is a bug in the compression mechanism of SMBv3.1.1. The bug affects Windows 10 versions 1903 and 1909, and it was announced and patched by Microsoft about 3 months ago. In the previous blog post we mentioned that although the Microsoft Security Advisory describes the bug as a Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability, there is no public POC that demonstrates RCE through this bug. This was true until chompie1337 released the first public RCE POC, based on the writeup of Ricerca Security. Our POC uses a different method, and doesn’t involve physical memory access. Instead, we use the SMBleed (CVE-2020-1206) bug to help with the exploitation.

Hear the news first

  • Only essential content
  • New vulnerabilities & announcements
  • News from ZecOps Research Team

Your subscription request to ZecOps Blog has been successfully sent.
We won’t spam, pinky swear 🤞

Aiming for RCE

Our previous research led to the local privilege escalation attack that we have shown in our previous writeup. SMBGhost can be used for an RCE attack and we aim to demonstrate how we achieved it in this series of blog posts. As we showed in the previous writeup, we were able to implement a remote write-what-where primitive. However, for an RCE capability we need to know where to write the arbitrary data. Since most of the memory layout in the modern Windows versions is randomized, having the ability to write arbitrary data in any location is still very limiting. While searching for another capability to assist with the attack, we discovered a new bug in Microsoft’s SMB implementation. For technical details and a POC, check out our recent publication. We named it SMBleed since it allows to leak parts of memory remotely, similar to Heartbleed, just via SMB. While the concept is similar and an authenticated user can read large blocks of uninitialized data, the attack surface without authentication is more limited. Since we aimed for an unauthenticated RCE exploitation, the first thing we looked for is a way to read memory unauthenticated.

Diving into SMB

Note: The following sections describe in detail a technique we were able to use for exploitation, but dumped in favor of a different approach which worked better in our case. Still, it’s an approach that we felt is worth sharing. If you prefer to stick to what ended up in our final POC, you can just read Observation #1 and Observation #2, and then skip to the A different approach – decompression section.

The SMBleed bug allows an attacker to send a message such that its beginning is controlled by the attacker, while the rest of the message contains uninitialized data which is treated as a part of the message. For an authenticated user, there’s an easy way to exploit this using the SMB2 WRITE message to write uninitialized data to a file, and then read it with the SMB2 READ command. We started by looking for a similar technique for an unauthenticated user – a way to send a message such that a part of it can be retrieved later.

After skimming over the protocol specification and debugging a couple of sessions, we saw that a regular flow begins with the following commands that are sent by the client:

SMB2 NEGOTIATE → SMB2 SESSION_SETUP → SMB2 SESSION_SETUP

If incorrect credentials are used, the session is aborted after the second SMB2 SESSION_SETUP request.

We assume that we don’t have valid credentials, so we checked whether other commands can be sent without authentication. We found the following after some experimentation:

  • The first command to be sent must be SMB2 NEGOTIATE. It also must be the only SMB2 NEGOTIATE command during the session.
  • The subsequent commands, until authentication completes successfully, must be SMB2 SESSION_SETUP. That is unless anonymous access to named pipes or shares is not restricted, and it is by default.

Since the SMB2 NEGOTIATE message is not compressed (the compression algorithm, if any, is decided during the negotiation), all that’s left is SMB2 SESSION_SETUP. So we took a closer look at the format of the SMB2 SESSION_SETUP message, hoping to find a way to get some of the data that is being sent back.

A closer look at SMB2 SESSION_SETUP

As we’ve already mentioned, a regular session that we observed sends two SMB2 SESSION_SETUP commands. At first, we checked whether one of the replies to these messages sends back some of the data. If that was the case, we could try to craft a message such that the data is left uninitialized. Unfortunately, we didn’t find such data. We couldn’t find a way to affect the first response, and the second response had an empty body and the 0xC000006D (STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE) status in the packet header (remember, we assume we don’t have valid credentials). The first SMB2 SESSION_SETUP request contains an NTLM Negotiate message, and the second SMB2 SESSION_SETUP request contains an NTLM Authenticate message. The former is rather simple, and we weren’t able to use it for something interesting, so we focused on the latter.

The NTLM Authenticate message

After studying the NTLM Authenticate message we came to the conclusion that the message’s most complex part, which is the best fit for misuse, is the NTLM2 V2 Response structure. It’s a  variable-length byte array, mostly consisting of the NTLMv2_CLIENT_CHALLENGE structure. We noticed that if the structure doesn’t pass some of the initial checks, the 0xC000000D (STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER) parameter is returned instead of 0xC000006D (STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE). Some of these checks are verifying the AvPairs field.

The AvPairs field is a variable-length byte array that contains a sequence of AV_PAIR structures. Each AV_PAIR structure defines an attribute/value pair. The attribute is defined by the AvId field, the AvLen field defines the value’s length in bytes, and the Value field is a variable-length byte-array that contains the value itself. An item with the attribute MsvAvEOL and a zero length marks the end of the array.

AvPairs inside the SMB2 packet.

The authentication message is handled by the SsprHandleAuthenticateMessage function in the msv1_0.dll module. Among the initial checks, the function makes sure that the AvPairs array contains the following attributes: 0x0001 (MsvAvNbComputerName), 0x0002 (MsvAvNbDomainName). The value is not checked. The check itself is done by traversing the array and checking whether the requested attribute exists, and whether its length is within the struct. If the length is too large, the traversal is stopped. So practically, the MsvAvEOL item is not required for the NTLM Authenticate message to be valid.

At this point we figured that we can craft a request that can provide an answer to the following question: Given two bytes at offset x, interpreted as uint16, is the value larger than y? x and y are controlled by us. Consider the following packet:

The content of value 0x0001 (MsvAvNbComputerName) doesn’t matter, so we can use it to adjust the offset of the second value. For the second value, we only set the attribute as 0x0002 (MsvAvNbDomainName), leaving the length and the value uninitialized. We also set the size of the whole packet so that there are y bytes that follow the length field. There are two possible outcomes depending on the uninitialized value of the length field of the second value:

  • length <= y: In this case the check passes, since a valid 0x0002 (MsvAvNbDomainName) value is found. The server returns 0xC000006D (STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE) since the credentials are incorrect.
  • length > y: In this case the check fails, since the second value has an invalid length and is discarded. The server returns 0xC000000D (STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER) for this case.

According to the server response we can deduce the answer to our question.

So, now we can get this small piece of information, right? Not so fast. Unfortunately, the NTLM Authenticate message is limited to 0xB48 bytes, and is discarded if it’s larger than that. The check is done by the SspContextGetMessage function in the msv1_0.dll module. Can we solve this problem by leaving only one of the two length bytes uninitialized? Unfortunately not, since the uint16 value is encoded as little endian, and to the best of our knowledge at this point, we can only leave the second, significant byte uninitialized, which doesn’t help too much. Unable to achieve something better within a single SMB session, we looked at what else can be done.

Observation #1: Lookaside lists

As we already mentioned in our previous research, the modules that handle SMB in the kernel (srv2.sys and srvnet.sys) use a custom allocation function, SrvNetAllocateBuffer, exported by srvnet.sys. This function uses lookaside lists for small allocations as an optimization. Lookaside lists are used for effectively reserving a set of reusable, fixed-size buffers for the driver.

The lookaside lists are created upon initialization, a list for each size and logical processor, as depicted in the following table:

→ Allocation size

Logical Processor
0x1100 0x2100 0x4100 0x8100 0x10100 0x20100 0x40100 0x80100 0x100100
Processor 1 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝
Processor 2 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝
Processor n 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝 📝

Each cell with the “📝” symbol is a separate lookaside list. To simplify our analysis, we’ll assume our target has only one logical processor (we’ll cover targets with more than one logical processor in the third part of the writeup). In this case, as long as the same amount of bytes is allocated, the same lookaside list is used, and the same allocated buffer is reused again and again. We can use this implementation detail to have some control over the uninitialized data, as we’ll see soon.

Observation #2: Failing the decompression

Let’s revisit what happens when a compressed packet is decompressed (refer to our previous research for more details and pseudocode):

In case CompressedData is invalid, the decompression stage fails, the copy stage is not executed, and the connection is dropped. But the decompression might fail only after extracting a part of CompressedData which is valid. This allows us to craft a request such that data of our choice will be written at an offset of our choice, like this:

Back to the NTLM Authenticate message

We can use the above observations to make our technique work by using two steps:

  1. Send a message with an invalid compressed data such that only a single zero byte is extracted. That byte will be the most significant byte of the length of the second value in the AvPairs array.
  2. Send a message just as before, but make sure that the same lookaside list is used for the allocation, so that the zero byte will be there.

This time, this technique can answer the following question: Given a byte at offset x, is the value larger than y? As before, x and y are controlled by us.

Since we can re-use the buffer again and again by making sure the same lookaside list is used, we can repeat the steps several times while changing y, and finally deduce the byte value at a given offset.

Unfortunately, this technique has a limitation – the offset of the byte we can read is limited to 0xADB bytes from the beginning of the packet buffer. That’s because the offset of the NTLM Authenticate message (AUTHENTICATE_MESSAGE) is limited to 0x40 bytes after the end of the SMB2 SESSION_SETUP headers (enforced by the Smb2ValidateSessionSetup function in srv2.sys), and the size of the NTLM Authenticate message (AUTHENTICATE_MESSAGE) is limited to 0xB48 bytes, as we already mentioned.

Overcoming the offset limitation

Let’s say that we want to read a byte at offset 0x1100 (we’ll see why we want to go that far in the third part of the writeup). We can’t do it directly with our technique, but we found the following solution: since the buffers get reused from the lookaside lists, we can “lift up” the target byte via the decompression function by setting the Offset field to point beyond that byte. We just need to make sure that the data that is located there can be interpreted as valid compressed data, otherwise the copying won’t happen.

The incoming packet buffer contains extra 16 header bytes which aren’t copied over when the decompression takes place. As a result, the copied data, including the target byte, is copied to a location 16 bytes closer to the beginning of the allocated buffer. We can repeat that several times, until the target byte offset is low enough.

Address leak POC

You can find a script that demonstrates the above technique here. Remember that we assumed that the target computer has only one logical processor, so you’ll have to configure your VM properly to get the script working. If all goes well, the script will read and print an address from the NonPagedPoolNx pool. In fact, that would be the address of one of the buffers residing in one of the lookaside lists.

A different approach – decompression

While advancing with our research, we realized that the decompressed SMB packet is not the only complex structure that can be invalid in various ways. Even before handling all of the SMB-related structures, the compressed buffer can be invalid as well. If the decompression fails, the connection is dropped, which can be detected.

Microsoft’s SMB implementation offers three compression algorithms to choose from: LZNT1, Plain LZ77 and LZ77+Huffman. We looked at LZNT1 since it’s the first in the list, and it’s rather simple – about 80 Python lines for a decompression function. Without diving too much into details, the compressed data consists of a sequence of compressed blocks, each beginning with a uint16 variable marking its length. When a length of zero is encountered, the decompression completes (similar to a NULL-terminated string, but it’s optional). Also, conveniently, a range of zero bytes represents valid compressed data. With the above, we managed to answer the same question as we did with the previous approach: Given a byte at offset x, is the value larger than y? Here, too, x and y are controlled by us.

We accomplished that by sending a valid packed which is followed by a range of bytes similar to the following (note that it’s a simplification, the actual byte values are a bit different):

There are two possible outcomes depending on the uninitialized value of the least significant byte of the length field:

  • length <= y: In this case the whole compressed block will consist out of zero bytes, which is completely valid, and the next block’s length will be zero, completing the decompression successfully. The server will return a response.
  • length > y: In this case, either the first or the second compression block will contain 0xFF bytes, which will fail the decompression. The server will drop the connection.

Just like with the previous technique, we can use observations #1 and #2 to craft a message with an uninitialized byte in the middle of the message by using two steps:

  1. Send a message with invalid compressed data such that only the part we need is extracted. The bytes that will be extracted are the bytes in the image above.
  2. Send a second message, but make sure that the same lookaside list is used for the allocation, so that the bytes from step 1 will be there.

Note that the Offset value in the SMB packet header will point to the compressed data, which can be valid or not depending on the value of the initialized byte. The valid SMB packet will be sent uncompressed. Note also that since the Offset value is larger than the message itself, there’s an overflow in the calculation of the compressed data size, which ends up being a huge number. Usually that’s not an issue since the decompression ends quickly, either successfully or not. But sometimes the system crashes due to an out of bounds read. We didn’t try to solve this since it happens rarely, and the POC is complex enough.

The most notable advantage of this technique compared to the previous one is that there’s no offset limitation anymore. Even though we managed to overcome the limitation, it required sending a large number of packets, hurting performance and stability.

ZecOps Detection

ZecOps classify forensics logs related to this issue as the following tags #SMBGhost and #SMBleed. You can find more information on how to use ZecOps solutions for Endpoints & Servers, Mobile devices, or applications.

Remediation

You can remediate the impact of both issues by doing one of the following:

  • Applying the latest security issues (recommended)
  • Block port 445 / enforce host-isolation
  • Disable SMBv3.1.1 compression

Part II – Summary

In this part, we described how we managed to read uninitialized data from the kernel pool, remotely and without authentication, by exploiting SMBGhost and SMBleed. In the third part we’ll show how it helped us achieve RCE.

SMBleedingGhost Writeup: Chaining SMBleed (CVE-2020-1206) with SMBGhost

9 June 2020 at 17:40
SMBleedingGhost Writeup: Chaining SMBleed (CVE-2020-1206) with SMBGhost

TL;DR

  • While looking at the vulnerable function of SMBGhost, we discovered another vulnerability: SMBleed (CVE-2020-1206).
  • SMBleed allows to leak kernel memory remotely.
  • Combined with SMBGhost, which was patched three months ago, SMBleed allows to achieve pre-auth Remote Code Execution (RCE).
  • POC #1: SMBleed remote kernel memory read: POC #1 Link
  • POC #2: Pre-Auth RCE Combining SMBleed with SMBGhost: POC #2 Link

Introduction

The SMBGhost (CVE-2020-0796) bug in the compression mechanism of SMBv3.1.1 was fixed about three months ago. In our previous writeup we explained the bug, and demonstrated a way to exploit it for local privilege escalation. As we found during our research, it’s not the only bug in the SMB decompression functionality. SMBleed happens in the same function as SMBGhost. The bug allows an attacker to read uninitialized kernel memory, as we illustrated in detail in this writeup.

Hear the news first

  • Only essential content
  • New vulnerabilities & announcements
  • News from ZecOps Research Team

Your subscription request to ZecOps Blog has been successfully sent.
We won’t spam, pinky swear 🤞

An observation

The bug happens in the same function as with SMBGhost, the Srv2DecompressData function in the srv2.sys SMB server driver.  Below is a simplified version of the function, with the irrelevant details omitted:

typedef struct _COMPRESSION_TRANSFORM_HEADER
{
    ULONG ProtocolId;
    ULONG OriginalCompressedSegmentSize;
    USHORT CompressionAlgorithm;
    USHORT Flags;
    ULONG Offset;
} COMPRESSION_TRANSFORM_HEADER, *PCOMPRESSION_TRANSFORM_HEADER;


typedef struct _ALLOCATION_HEADER
{
    // ...
    PVOID UserBuffer;
    // ...
} ALLOCATION_HEADER, *PALLOCATION_HEADER;


NTSTATUS Srv2DecompressData(PCOMPRESSION_TRANSFORM_HEADER Header, SIZE_T TotalSize)
{
    PALLOCATION_HEADER Alloc = SrvNetAllocateBuffer(
        (ULONG)(Header->OriginalCompressedSegmentSize + Header->Offset),
        NULL);
    If (!Alloc) {
        return STATUS_INSUFFICIENT_RESOURCES;
    }


    ULONG FinalCompressedSize = 0;


    NTSTATUS Status = SmbCompressionDecompress(
        Header->CompressionAlgorithm,
        (PUCHAR)Header + sizeof(COMPRESSION_TRANSFORM_HEADER) + Header->Offset,
        (ULONG)(TotalSize - sizeof(COMPRESSION_TRANSFORM_HEADER) - Header->Offset),
        (PUCHAR)Alloc->UserBuffer + Header->Offset,
        Header->OriginalCompressedSegmentSize,
        &FinalCompressedSize);
    if (Status < 0 || FinalCompressedSize != Header->OriginalCompressedSegmentSize) {
        SrvNetFreeBuffer(Alloc);
        return STATUS_BAD_DATA;
    }


    if (Header->Offset > 0) {
        memcpy(
            Alloc->UserBuffer,
            (PUCHAR)Header + sizeof(COMPRESSION_TRANSFORM_HEADER),
            Header->Offset);
    }


    Srv2ReplaceReceiveBuffer(some_session_handle, Alloc);
    return STATUS_SUCCESS;
}

The Srv2DecompressData function receives the compressed message which is sent by the client, allocates the required amount of memory, and decompresses the data. Then, if the Offset field is not zero, it copies the data that is placed before the compressed data as is to the beginning of the allocated buffer.

The SMBGhost bug happened due to lack of integer overflow checks. It was fixed by Microsoft and even though we didn’t add it to our function to keep it simple, this time we will assume that the function checks for integer overflows and discards the message in these cases. Even with these checks in place, there’s still a serious bug. Can you spot it?

Faking OriginalCompressedSegmentSize again

Previously, we exploited SMBGhost by setting the OriginalCompressedSegmentSize field to be a huge number, causing an integer overflow followed by an out of bounds write. What if we set it to be a number which is just a little bit larger than the actual decompressed data we send? For example, if the size of our compressed data is x after decompression, and we set OriginalCompressedSegmentSize to be x + 0x1000, we’ll get the following:

The uninitialized kernel data is going to be treated as a part of our message.

If you didn’t read our previous writeup, you might think that the Srv2DecompressData function call should fail due to the check that follows the SmbCompressionDecompress call:

if (Status < 0 || FinalCompressedSize != Header->OriginalCompressedSegmentSize) {
    SrvNetFreeBuffer(Alloc);
    return STATUS_BAD_DATA;
}

Specifically, in our example, you might assume that while the value of the OriginalCompressedSegmentSize field is x + 0x1000, FinalCompressedSize will be set to x in this case. In fact, FinalCompressedSize will be set to x + 0x1000 as well due to the implementation of the SmbCompressionDecompress function:

NTSTATUS SmbCompressionDecompress(
    USHORT CompressionAlgorithm,
    PUCHAR UncompressedBuffer,
    ULONG  UncompressedBufferSize,
    PUCHAR CompressedBuffer,
    ULONG  CompressedBufferSize,
    PULONG FinalCompressedSize)
{
    // ...

    NTSTATUS Status = RtlDecompressBufferEx2(
        ...,
        FinalUncompressedSize,
        ...);
    if (status >= 0) {
        *FinalCompressedSize = CompressedBufferSize;
    }

    // ...

    return Status;
}

In case of a successful decompression, FinalCompressedSize is updated to hold the value of CompressedBufferSize, which is the size of the buffer. Not only this seemingly unnecessary, deliberate update of the FinalCompressedSize value made the exploitation of SMBGhost easier, it also allowed the SMBleed bug to exist.

Basic exploitation

The SMB message we used to demonstrate the vulnerability is the SMB2 WRITE message. The message structure contains fields such as the amount of bytes to write and flags, followed by a variable length buffer. That’s perfect for exploiting the bug, since we can craft a message such that we specify the header, but the variable length buffer contains uninitialized data. We based our POC on Microsoft’s WindowsProtocolTestSuites repository (that we also used for the first SMBGhost reproduction), introducing this small addition to the compression function:

// HACK: fake size
if (((Smb2SinglePacket)packet).Header.Command == Smb2Command.WRITE)
{
    ((Smb2WriteRequestPacket)packet).PayLoad.Length += 0x1000;
    compressedPacket.Header.OriginalCompressedSegmentSize += 0x1000;
}

Note that our POC requires credentials and a writable share, which are available in many scenarios, but the bug applies to every message, so it can potentially be exploited without authentication. Also note that the leaked memory is from previous allocations in the NonPagedPoolNx pool, and since we control the allocation size, we might be able to control the data that is being leaked to some degree.

SMBleed POC Source Code

Affected Windows versions

Windows 10 versions 1903, 1909 and 2004 are affected. During testing, our POC crashed one of our Windows 10 1903 machines. After analyzing the crash with Neutrino we saw that the earliest, unpatched versions of Windows 10 1903 have a null pointer dereference bug while handling valid, compressed SMB packets. Please note, we didn’t investigate further to find whether it’s possible to bypass the null pointer dereference bug and exploit the system.

An unpatched system, null pointer dereference happens here.
A patched system, the added null pointer check.

Here’s a summary of the affected Windows versions with the relevant updates installed:

Windows 10 Version 2004

Update SMBGhost SMBleed
KB4557957 Not Vulnerable Not Vulnerable
Before KB4557957 Not Vulnerable Vulnerable

Windows 10 Version 1909

Update SMBGhost SMBleed
KB4560960 Not Vulnerable Not Vulnerable
KB4551762 Not Vulnerable Vulnerable
Before KB4551762 Vulnerable Vulnerable

Windows 10 Version 1903

Update Null Dereference Bug SMBGhost SMBleed
KB4560960 Fixed Not Vulnerable Not Vulnerable
KB4551762 Fixed Not Vulnerable Vulnerable
KB4512941 Fixed Vulnerable Vulnerable
None of the above Not Fixed Vulnerable Potentially vulnerable*

* We haven’t tried to bypass the null dereference bug, but it may be possible through another method (for example, using SMBGhost Write-What-Where primitive)

SMBleedingGhost? Chaining SMBleed with SMBGhost for pre-auth RCE

Exploiting the SMBleed bug without authentication is less straightforward, but also possible. We were able to use it together with the SMBGhost bug to achieve RCE (Remote Code Execution). A writeup with the technical details will be published soon. For now, please see below a POC demonstrating the exploitation. This POC is released only for educational and research purposes, as well as for  evaluation of security defenses. Use at your own risk. ZecOps takes no responsibility for any misuse of this POC. 

SMBGhost + SMBleed RCE POC Source Code

Detection

ZecOps Neutrino customers detect exploitation of SMBleed & SMBGhost – no further action is required. SMBleed & SMBGhost can be detected in multiple ways, including crash dump analysis, a network traffic analysis. Signatures are available to ZecOps Threat Intelligence subscribers. Feel free to reach out to us at [email protected] for more information.

Remediation

You can remediate both SMBleed and SMBGhost by doing one or more of the following things:

  1. Windows update will solve the issues completely (recommended)
  2. Blocking port 445 will stop lateral movements using these vulnerabilities
  3. Enforcing host isolation
  4. Disabling SMB 3.1.1 compression (not a recommended solution)

Shout out to Chompie that exploited this bug with a different technique. Chompie’s POC is available here.

Hidden demons? MailDemon Patch Analysis: iOS 13.4.5 Beta vs. iOS 13.5

24 May 2020 at 08:30
Hidden demons? MailDemon Patch Analysis: iOS 13.4.5 Beta vs. iOS 13.5

Summary and TL;DR

Further to Apple’s patch of the MailDemon vulnerability (see our blog here), ZecOps Research Team has analyzed and compared the MailDemon patches of iOS 13.4.5 beta and iOS 13.5. 

Our analysis concluded  that the patches are different, and that iOS 13.4.5 beta patch was incomplete and could be still vulnerable under certain circumstances. 

Since the 13.4.5 beta patch was insufficient, Apple issued a complete patch utilising a different approach which fixed this issue completely on both iOS 13.5 and iOS 12.4.7 as a special security update for older devices. 

This may explain why it took about one month for a full patch to be released. 

iOS 13.4.5 beta patch

The following is the heap-overflow vulnerability patch on iOS 13.4.5 beta.  

The function  -[MFMutableData appendBytes:length:] raises an exception if  -[MFMutableData _mapMutableData] returns false.

In order to see when -[MFMutableData _mapMutableData] returns false, let’s take a look at how it is implemented:

When mmap fails it returns False, but still allocates a 8-bytes chunk and stores the pointer in self->bytes. This patch raises an exception before copying data into self->bytes, which solves the heap overflow issue partially.

 -[MFMutableData appendData:]
 |
 +--  -[MFMutableData appendBytes:length:] **<-patch**
    |
    +-- -[MFMutableData _mapMutableData]

The patch makes sure an exception will be raised inside -[MFMutableData appendBytes:length:]. However, there are other functions that call -[MFMutableData _mapMutableData] and interact with self->bytes which will be an 8-bytes chunk if mmap fails, these functions do not check if mmap fails or not since the patch only affects -[MFMutableData appendBytes:length:].

Following is an actual backtrace taken from MobileMail:

 * frame #0: 0x000000022a0fd018 MIME`-[MFMutableData _mapMutableData:]
    frame #1: 0x000000022a0fc2cc MIME`-[MFMutableData bytes] + 108
    frame #2: 0x000000022a0fc314 MIME`-[MFMutableData mutableBytes] + 52
    frame #3: 0x000000022a0f091c MIME`_MappedAllocatorAllocate + 76
    frame #4: 0x0000000218cd4e9c CoreFoundation`_CFRuntimeCreateInstance + 324
    frame #5: 0x0000000218cee5c4 CoreFoundation`__CFStringCreateImmutableFunnel3 + 1908
    frame #6: 0x0000000218ceeb04 CoreFoundation`CFStringCreateWithBytes + 44
    frame #7: 0x000000022a0eab94 MIME`_MFCreateStringWithBytes + 80
    frame #8: 0x000000022a0eb3a8 MIME`_filter_checkASCII + 84
    frame #9: 0x000000022a0ea7b4 MIME`MFCreateStringWithBytes + 136
-[MFMutableData mutableBytes]
|
+--  -[MFMutableData bytes]
   |
   +--  -[MFMutableData _mapMutableData:]

Since the bytes returned by mutableBytes is usually considered to be modifiable given following from Apple’s documentation:

This property is similar to, but different than the bytes property. The bytes property contains a pointer to a constant. You can use The bytes pointer to read the data managed by the data object, but you cannot modify that data. However, if the mutableBytes property contains a non-null pointer, this pointer points to mutable data. You can use the mutableBytes pointer to modify the data managed by the data object.

Apple’s documentation

Both -[MFMutableData mutableBytes] and -[MFMutableData bytes] returns self->bytes points to the 8-bytes chunk if mmap fails, which might lead to heap overflow under some circumstances.

The following is an example of how things could go wrong, the heap overflow still would happen even if it checks length before memcpy:

size_t length = 0x30000;
MFMutableData* mdata = [MFMutableData alloc];
data = malloc(length);
[mdata initWithBytesNoCopy:data length:length];    
size_t mdata_len = [mdata length];
char* mbytes = [mdata mutableBytes];//mbytes could be a 8-bytes chunk
size_t new_data_len = 90;
char* new_data = malloc(new_data_len);
if (new_data_len <= mdata_len) {
    memcpy(mbytes, new_data, new_data_len);//heap overflow if mmap fails
}

iOS 13.5 Patch

Following the iOS 13.5 patch, an exception is raised in “-[MFMutableData _mapMutableData] ”, right after mmap fails and it doesn’t return the 8-bytes chunk anymore. This approach fixes the issue completely.

Summary

iOS 13.5 patch is the correct way to patch the heap overflow vulnerability. It is important to double check security patches and verify that the patch is complete. 

At ZecOps we help developers to find security weaknesses, and validate if the issue was correctly solved automatically. If you would like to find similar vulnerabilities in your applications/programs, we are now adding additional users to our CrashOps SDK beta program
If you do not own an app, and would like to inspect your phone for suspicious activity – check out ZecOps iOS DFIR solution – Gluon.

Seeing (Mail)Demons? Technique, Triggers, and a Bounty

9 May 2020 at 19:39
Seeing (Mail)Demons? Technique, Triggers, and a Bounty

Impact & Key Details (TL;DR)

  1. Demonstrate a way to do a basic heap spray
  2. We were able to use this technique to verify that this vulnerability is exploitable. We are still working on improving the success rate.
  3. Present two new examples of in-the-wild triggers so you can judge by yourself if these bugs worth an out of band patch
  4. Suggestions to Apple on how to improve forensics information / logs and important questions following Apple’s response to the previous disclosure
  5. Launching a bounty program for people who have traces of attacks with total bounties of $27,337
  6. MailDemon appears to be even more ancient than we initially thought. There is a trigger for this vulnerability, in the wild, 10 years ago, on iPhone 2g, iOS 3.1.3

Following our announcement of RCE vulnerabilities discovery in the default Mail application on iOS, we have been contacted by numerous individuals who suspect they were targeted by this and related vulnerabilities in Mail.

ZecOps encourages Apple to release an out of band patch for the recently disclosed vulnerabilities and hopes that this blog will provide additional reinforcement to release patches as early as possible. In this blogpost we will show a simple way to spray the heap, whereby we were able to prove that remote exploitation of this issue is possible, and we will also provide two examples of triggers observed in the wild.

At present, we already have the following:

  • Remote heap-overflow in Mail application
  • Ability to trigger the vulnerability remotely with attacker-controlled input through an incoming mail
  • Ability to alter code execution
  • Kernel Elevation of Privileges 0day

What we don’t have:

  • An infoleak – but therein rests a surprise: an infoleak is not mandatory to be in Mail since an infoleak in almost any other process would be sufficient. Since dyld_shared_cache is shared through most processes, an infoleak vulnerability doesn’t necessarily have to be inside MobileMail, for example CVE-2019-8646 of iMessage can do the trick remotely as well – which opens additional attack surface (Facetime, other apps, iMessage, etc). There is a great talk by 5aelo during OffensiveCon covering similar topics.

Therefore, now we have all the requirements to exploit this bug remotely. Nonetheless, we prefer to be cautious  in chaining this together because:

  • We have no intention of disclosing the LPE – it allows us to perform filesystem extraction / memory inspection on A12 devices and above when needed. You can read more about the problems of analyzing mobile devices at FreeTheSandbox.org
  • We haven’t seen exploitation in the wild for the LPE.

We will also share two examples of triggers that we have seen in the wild and let you make your own inferences and conclusions. 

the mail-demon vulnerability
were you targeted by this vulnerability?

MailDemon Bounty

Lastly, we will present a bounty for those submissions that were able to demonstrate that they were attacked.

Exploiting MailDemon

As we previously hinted, MailDemon is a great candidate for exploitation because it overwrites small chunks of a MALLOC_NANO memory region, which stores a large number of Objective-C objects. Consequently, it allows attackers to manipulate an ISA pointer of the corrupted objects (allowing them to cause type confusions) or overwrite a function pointer to control the code flow of the process. This represents a viable approach of taking over the affected process.

Heap Spray & Heap Grooming Technique

In order to control the code flow, a heap spray is required to place crafted data into the memory. With the sprayed fake class containing a fake method cache of ‘dealloc’ method, we were able to control the Program Counter (PC) register after triggering the vulnerability using this method*.

The following is a partial crash log generated while testing our POC:

Exception Type:  EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGBUS)
Exception Subtype: EXC_ARM_DA_ALIGN at 0xdeadbeefdeadbeef
VM Region Info: 0xdeadbeefdeadbeef is not in any region.  Bytes after previous region: 16045690973559045872  
      REGION TYPE                      START - END             [ VSIZE] PRT/MAX SHRMOD  REGION DETAIL
      MALLOC_NANO            0000000280000000-00000002a0000000 [512.0M] rw-/rwx SM=PRV  
--->  
      UNUSED SPACE AT END

Thread 18 name:  Dispatch queue: com.apple.CFNetwork.Connection
Thread 18 Crashed:
0   ???                           	0xdeadbeefdeadbeef 0 + -2401053088876216593
1   libdispatch.dylib             	0x00000001b7732338 _dispatch_lane_serial_drain$VARIANT$mp  + 612
2   libdispatch.dylib             	0x00000001b7732e74 _dispatch_lane_invoke$VARIANT$mp  + 480
3   libdispatch.dylib             	0x00000001b773410c _dispatch_workloop_invoke$VARIANT$mp  + 1960
4   libdispatch.dylib             	0x00000001b773b4ac _dispatch_workloop_worker_thread  + 596
5   libsystem_pthread.dylib       	0x00000001b796a114 _pthread_wqthread  + 304
6   libsystem_pthread.dylib       	0x00000001b796ccd4 start_wqthread  + 4


Thread 18 crashed with ARM Thread State (64-bit):
    x0: 0x0000000281606300   x1: 0x00000001e4b97b04   x2: 0x0000000000000004   x3: 0x00000001b791df30
    x4: 0x00000002827e81c0   x5: 0x0000000000000000   x6: 0x0000000106e5af60   x7: 0x0000000000000940
    x8: 0x00000001f14a6f68   x9: 0x00000001e4b97b04  x10: 0x0000000110000ae0  x11: 0x000000130000001f
   x12: 0x0000000110000b10  x13: 0x000001a1f14b0141  x14: 0x00000000ef02b800  x15: 0x0000000000000057
   x16: 0x00000001f14b0140  x17: 0xdeadbeefdeadbeef  x18: 0x0000000000000000  x19: 0x0000000108e68038
   x20: 0x0000000108e68000  x21: 0x0000000108e68000  x22: 0x000000016ff3f0e0  x23: 0xa3a3a3a3a3a3a3a3
   x24: 0x0000000282721140  x25: 0x0000000108e68038  x26: 0x000000016ff3eac0  x27: 0x00000002827e8e80
   x28: 0x000000016ff3f0e0   fp: 0x000000016ff3e870   lr: 0x00000001b6f3db9c
    sp: 0x000000016ff3e400   pc: 0xdeadbeefdeadbeef cpsr: 0x60000000

The ideal primitive for heap spray in this case is a memory leak bug that can be triggered from remote, since we want the sprayed memory to stay untouched until the memory corruption is triggered. We left this as an exercise for the reader. Such primitive could qualify for up to $7,337 bounty from ZecOps (read more below).

Another way is using MFMutableData itself – when the size of MFMutableData is less than 0x20000 bytes it allocates memory from the heap instead of creating a file to store the content. And we can control the MFMutableData size by splitting content of the email into lines less than 0x20000 bytes since the IMAP library reads email content by lines. With this primitive we have a better chance to place payload into the address we want.

Trigger

An oversized email is capable of reproducing the vulnerability as a PoC(see details in our previous blog), but for a stable exploit, we need to take a closer look at “-[MFMutableData appendBytes:length:]“

-[MFMutableData appendBytes:length:] 
{
  int old_len = [self length];
  //...
  char* bytes = self->bytes;
  if(!bytes){
     bytes = [self _mapMutableData]; //Might be a data pointer of a size 8 heap
  }
  copy_dst = bytes + old_len;
  //...
  memmove(copy_dst, append_bytes, append_length); // It used append_length to copy the memory, causing an OOB writing in a small heap
}

The destination address of memove is ”bytes + old_len” instead of’ ‘bytes”. So what if we accumulate too much data before triggering the vulnerability? The “old_len” would end up with a very big value so that the destination address will end up in a invalid address which is beyond the edge of this region and crash immediately, given that the size of MALLOC_NANO region is 512MB.


             +----------------+0x280000000
             |                |
   bytes --> +----------------+\
             |                | +
             |                | |
             |                | |
             |    padding     | |
             |                | |
             |                | | old_len
             |                | |
             |                | |
             |                | |
             |                | +
copy_dst --> +----------------+/
             | overflow data  |
             +----------------+
             |                |
             |                |
             |                |
             |                |
             +----------------+0x2a0000000

In order to reduce the size of “padding”, we need to consume as much data as possible before triggering the vulnerability – a memory leak would be one of our candidates.

Noteworthy, the “padding” doesn’t mean the overflow address is completely random, the “padding” is predictable by hardware models since the RAM size is the same, and mmap is usually failed at the same size during our tests.

Crash analysis

This post discusses several triggers and exploitability of the MobileMail vulnerability detected in the wild which we covered in our previous blog.

Case 1 shows that the vulnerability is triggered in the wild before it was disclosed.

Case 2 is due to memory corruption in the MALLOC_NANO region, the value of the corrupted memory is part of the sent email and completely controlled by the sender.

Case 1

The following crash was triggered right inside the vulnerable function while the overflow happens. 

Coalition:           com.apple.mobilemail [521]

Exception Type:  EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
Exception Subtype: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x000000004a35630e //[a]
VM Region Info: 0x4a35630e is not in any region.  Bytes before following region: 3091946738
      REGION TYPE                      START - END             [ VSIZE] PRT/MAX SHRMOD  REGION DETAIL
      UNUSED SPACE AT START
--->  
      __TEXT                 000000010280c000-0000000102aec000 [ 2944K] r-x/r-x SM=COW  ...p/MobileMail]


Thread 4 Crashed:
0   libsystem_platform.dylib      	0x00000001834a5a80 _platform_memmove  + 208
       0x1834a5a74         ldnp x10, x11, [x1, #16]       
       0x1834a5a78         add x1, x1, 0x20               
       0x1834a5a7c         sub x2, x2, x5                 
       0x1834a5a80         stp x12, x13, [x0]   //[b]          
       0x1834a5a84         stp x14, x15, [x0, #16]        
       0x1834a5a88         subs x2, x2, 0x40              
       0x1834a5a8c         b.ls 0x00002ab0    

1   MIME                          	0x00000001947ae104 -[MFMutableData appendBytes:length:]  + 356
2   Message                       	0x0000000194f6ce6c -[MFDAMessageContentConsumer consumeData:length:format:mailMessage:]  + 804
3   DAEAS                         	0x000000019ac5ca8c -[ASAccount folderItemsSyncTask:handleStreamOperation:forCodePage:tag:withParentItem:withData:dataLength:]  + 736
4   DAEAS                         	0x000000019aca3fd0 -[ASFolderItemsSyncTask handleStreamOperation:forCodePage:tag:withParentItem:withData:dataLength:]  + 524
5   DAEAS                         	0x000000019acae338 -[ASItem _streamYourLittleHeartOutWithContext:]  + 440
6   DAEAS                         	0x000000019acaf4d4 -[ASItem _streamIfNecessaryFromContext:]  + 96
7   DAEAS                         	0x000000019acaf758 -[ASItem _parseNextValueWithDataclass:context:root:parent:callbackDict:streamCallbackDict:parseRules:account:]  + 164
8   DAEAS                         	0x000000019acb001c -[ASItem parseASParseContext:root:parent:callbackDict:streamCallbackDict:account:]  + 776
9   DAEAS                         	0x000000019acaf7d8 -[ASItem _parseNextValueWithDataclass:context:root:parent:callbackDict:streamCallbackDict:parseRules:account:]  + 292
10  DAEAS                         	0x000000019acb001c -[ASItem parseASParseContext:root:parent:callbackDict:streamCallbackDict:account:]  + 776
...

Thread 4 crashed with ARM Thread State (64-bit):
    x0: 0x000000004a35630e   x1: 0x00000001149af432   x2: 0x0000000000001519   x3: 0x000000004a356320
    x4: 0x0000000100000028   x5: 0x0000000000000012   x6: 0x0000000c04000100   x7: 0x0000000114951a00
    x8: 0x44423d30443d3644   x9: 0x443d30443d38463d  x10: 0x3d31413d31443d30  x11: 0x31413d31463d3444
   x12: 0x33423d30453d3043  x13: 0x433d30443d35423d  x14: 0x3d30443d36443d44  x15: 0x30443d38463d4442
   x16: 0x00000001834a59b0  x17: 0x0200080110000100  x18: 0xfffffff00a0dd260  x19: 0x000000000000152b
   x20: 0x00000001149af400  x21: 0x000000004a35630e  x22: 0x000000004a35630f  x23: 0x0000000000000008
   x24: 0x000000000000152b  x25: 0x0000000000000000  x26: 0x0000000000000000  x27: 0x00000001149af400
   x28: 0x000000018dbd34bc   fp: 0x000000016da4c720   lr: 0x00000001947ae104
    sp: 0x000000016da4c720   pc: 0x00000001834a5a80 cpsr: 0x80000000

With [a] and [b] we know that the process crashed inside “memmove” called by “-[MFMutableData appendBytes:length:]”, which means the value of “copy_dst” is an invalid address at first place which is 0x4a35630e.

So where did the value of the register x0 (0x4a35630e) come from? It’s much smaller than the lowest valid address. 

Turns out that the process crashed when after failing to mmap a file and then failing to allocate the 8 byte memory at the same time. 

The invalid address 0x4a35630e is actually the offset which is the length of MFMutableData before triggering the vulnerability(i.e. “old_len”). When calloc fails to allocate the memory it returns NULL, so the copy_dst will be “0 + old_len(0x4a35630e)”. 

In this case the “old_len” is about 1.2GB which matches the average length of our POC which is likely to cause mmap failure and trigger the vulnerability.

Please note that x8-x15, and x0 are fully controlled by the sender.

The crash gives us another answer for our question above: “What if we accumulate too much data before triggering the vulnerability?” – The allocation of the 8-bytes memory could fail and crash while copying the payload to an invalid address. This can make reliable exploitation more difficult, as we may crash before taking over the program counter.

A Blast From The Past: Mysterious Trigger on iOS 3.1.3 in 2010!

Noteworthy, we found a public example of exactly a similar trigger by an anonymous user in modmy.com forums: https://forums.modmy.com/native-iphone-ipod-touch-app-launches-f29/734050-mail-app-keeps-crashing-randomly.html

Vulnerable version: iOS 3.1.3 on iPhone 2G
Time of crash: 22nd of October, 2010

The user “shyamsandeep”, registered on the 12th of June 2008 and last logged in on the 16th of October 2011 and had a single post in the forum, which contained this exact trigger.

This crash had r0 equal to 0x037ea000, which could be the result of the 1st vulnerability we disclosed in our previous blog which was due to ftruncate() failure. Interestingly, as we explained in the first case, it could also be a result of the allocation of 8-bytes memory failure however it is not possible to determine the exact reason since the log lacked memory regions information. Nonetheless, it is certain that there were triggers in the wild for this exploitable vulnerability since 2010.

Identifier: MobileMail
Version: ??? (???)
Code Type: ARM (Native)
Parent Process: launchd [1]

Date/Time: 2010-10-22 08:14:31.640 +0530
OS Version: iPhone OS 3.1.3 (7E18)
Report Version: 104

Exception Type: EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV) Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x037ea000 Crashed Thread: 4
Thread 4 Crashed:
0 libSystem.B.dylib 0x33aaef3c 0x33aad000 + 7996 //memcpy + 0x294
1 MIME 0x30a822a4 0x30a7f000 + 12964 //_FastMemoryMove + 0x44
2 MIME 0x30a8231a 0x30a7f000 + 13082 // -[MFMutableData appendBytes:length:] + 0x6a
3 MIME 0x30a806d6 0x30a7f000 + 5846 // -[MFMutableData appendData:] + 0x32
4 Message 0x342e2938 0x34251000 + 596280 // -[DAMessageContentConsumer consumeData:length:format:mailMessage:] + 0x25c
5 Message 0x342e1ff8 0x34251000 + 593912 // -[DAMailAccountSyncConsumer consumeData:length:format:mailMessage:] +0x24
6 DataAccess 0x34146b22 0x3413e000 + 35618 // -[ASAccount
folderItemsSyncTask:handleStreamOperation:forCodePage:tag:withParentItem:withData:dataLength:] + 0x162
7 DataAccess 0x3416657c 0x3413e000 + 165244 //[ASFolderItemsSyncTaskhandleStreamOperation:forCodePage:tag:withParentIt em:withData:dataLength:] + 0x108
...

Thread 4 crashed with ARM Thread State:
r0: 0x037ea000 r1: 0x008729e0 r2: 0x00002205 r3: 0x4e414153
r4: 0x41415367 r5: 0x037e9825 r6: 0x00872200 r7: 0x007b8b78
r8: 0x0001f825 r9: 0x001fc098 r10: 0x00872200 r11: 0x0087c200
ip: 0x0000068a sp: 0x007b8b6c lr: 0x30a822ab pc: 0x33aaef3c
cpsr: 0x20000010

Case 2

Following is another crash that happened after an email was received and processed.

Coalition:           com.apple.mobilemail [308]

Exception Type:  EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
Exception Subtype: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x0041004100410041 // [a]
VM Region Info: 0x41004100410041 is not in any region.  Bytes after previous region: 18296140473139266  
      REGION TYPE                      START - END             [ VSIZE] PRT/MAX SHRMOD  REGION DETAIL
      mapped file            00000002d31f0000-00000002d6978000 [ 55.5M] r--/rw- SM=COW  ...t_id=9bfc1855
--->  
      UNUSED SPACE AT END

Thread 13 name:  Dispatch queue: Internal _UICache queue
Thread 13 Crashed:
0   libobjc.A.dylib               	0x00000001b040fca0 objc_release  + 16
       0x1b040fc94         mov x29, sp                    
       0x1b040fc98         cbz x0, 0x0093fce4             
       0x1b040fc9c         tbnz x0, #63, 0x0093fce4       
       0x1b040fca0         ldr x8, [x0]            // [b]       
       0x1b040fca4         and x8, x8, 0xffffffff8        
       0x1b040fca8         ldrb w8, [x8, #32]             
       0x1b040fcac         tbz w8, #2, 0x0093fd14         

1   CoreFoundation                	0x00000001b1119408 -[__NSDictionaryM removeAllObjects]  + 600
2   libdispatch.dylib             	0x00000001b0c5d7d4 _dispatch_client_callout  + 16
3   libdispatch.dylib             	0x00000001b0c0bc1c _dispatch_lane_barrier_sync_invoke_and_complete  + 56    
4   UIFoundation                  	0x00000001bb9136b0 __16-[_UICache init]_block_invoke  + 76     
5   libdispatch.dylib             	0x00000001b0c5d7d4 _dispatch_client_callout  + 16
6   libdispatch.dylib             	0x00000001b0c0201c _dispatch_continuation_pop$VARIANT$mp  + 412
7   libdispatch.dylib             	0x00000001b0c11fa8 _dispatch_source_invoke$VARIANT$mp  + 1308
8   libdispatch.dylib             	0x00000001b0c0ee00 _dispatch_kevent_worker_thread  + 1224   
9   libsystem_pthread.dylib       	0x00000001b0e3e124 _pthread_wqthread  + 320          
10  libsystem_pthread.dylib       	0x00000001b0e40cd4 start_wqthread  + 4 


Thread 13 crashed with ARM Thread State (64-bit):
    x0: 0x0041004100410041   x1: 0x00000001de1ac18a   x2: 0x0000000000000000   x3: 0x0000000000000010
    x4: 0x00000001b0c60388   x5: 0x0000000000000010   x6: 0x0000000000000000   x7: 0x0000000000000000
    x8: 0x0000000281f94090   x9: 0x00000001b143f670  x10: 0x0000000142846800  x11: 0x0000004b0000007f
   x12: 0x00000001428468a0  x13: 0x000041a1eb487861  x14: 0x0000000283ed9d10  x15: 0x0000000000000004
   x16: 0x00000001eb487860  x17: 0x00000001b11191b0  x18: 0x0000000000000000  x19: 0x0000000281dce4c0
   x20: 0x0000000282693398  x21: 0x0000000282693330  x22: 0x0000000000000000  x23: 0x0000000000000000
   x24: 0x0000000281dce4c8  x25: 0x000000000c000000  x26: 0x000000000000000d  x27: 0x00000001eb48e000
   x28: 0x0000000282693330   fp: 0x000000016b8fe820   lr: 0x00000001b1119408
    sp: 0x000000016b8fe820   pc: 0x00000001b040fca0 cpsr: 0x20000000

[a]: The pointer of the object was overwritten with “0x0041004100410041” which is AAAA in unicode. 

[b] is one of the instructions around the crashed address we’ve added for better understanding, the process crashed on instruction “ldr x8, [x0]” while -[__NSDictionaryM removeAllObjects] was trying to release one the objects.

By reverse engineering -[__NSDictionaryM removeAllObjects], we understand that register x0 was loaded from x28(0x0000000282693330), since register x28 was never changed before the crash.

Let’s take a look at the virtual memory region information of x28: 0x0000000282693330, the overwritten object was stored in MALLOC_NANO region which stores small heap chunks. The heap overflow vulnerability corrupts the same region since it overflows on a 8-bytes heap chunk which is also stored in MALLOC_NANO.

  MALLOC_NANO         	 0x0000000280000000-0x00000002a0000000	 rw-/rwx

This crash is actually pretty close to controlling the PC since it controls the pointer of an Objective-C object. By pointing the value of register x0 to a memory sprayed with a fake object and class with fake method cache, the attackers could control the PC pointer, this phrack blog explains the details.

Summary

  1. It is rare to see that user-provided inputs trigger and control remote vulnerabilities. 
  2. We prove that it is possible to exploit this vulnerability using the described technique.
  3. We have observed real world triggers with a large allocation size.
  4. We have seen real world triggers with values that are controlled by the sender.
  5. The emails we looked for were missing / deleted.
  6. Success-rate can be improved. This bug had in-the-wild triggers in 2010 on an iPhone 2G device.
  7. In our opinion, based on the above, this bug is worth an out of band patch.

How Can Apple Improve the Logs?

The lack of details in iOS logs and the lack of options to choose the granularity of the data  for both individuals and organizations need to change to get iOS to be on-par with MacOS, Linux, and Windows capabilities. In general, the concept of hacking into a phone in order to analyze it, is completely flawed and should not  be the normal way to do it.

We suggest Apple improve its error diagnostics process to help individuals, organizations, and SOCs to investigate their devices. We have a few helpful technical suggestions:

  1. Crashes improvement: Enable to see memory next to each pointer / register
  2. Crashes improvement: Show stack / heap memory / memory near registers
  3. Add PIDs/PPIDs/UID/EUID to all applicable events
  4. Ability to send these logs to a remote server without physically connecting the phone – we are aware of multiple cases where the logs were mysteriously deleted
  5. Ability to perform complete digital forensics analysis of suspected iOS devices without a need to hack into the device first.

Questions for Apple

  • How many triggers have you seen to this heap overflow since iOS 3.1.3? 
  • How were you able to determine within one day that all of the triggers to this bug were not malicious and did you actually go over each event ? 
  • When are you planning to patch this vulnerability?
  • What are you going to do about enhancing forensics on mobile devices (see the list above)?

MailDemon Bounty

If you experienced any of the three symptoms below, use another mail application (e.g. Outlook for Desktop), and send the relevant emails (including the Email Source) to the address [email protected]– there are instructions at the bottom of this post.

Suspected emails may appear as follows:

Bounty details: We will validate if the email contains an exploit code. For the first two submissions containing Mail exploits that were verified by ZecOps team, we will provide:

  • $10,000 USD bounty
  • One license for ZecOps Gluon (DFIR for mobile devices) for 1 year
  • One license for ZecOps Neutrino (DFIR for endpoints and servers) for 1 year. 

We will provide an additional bounty of up to $7,337 for exploit primitive as described above.

We will determine what were the first two valid submissions according to the date they were received in our email server and if they contain an exploit code. A total of $27,337 USD in bounties and licenses of ZecOps Gluon & Neutrino. 

For suspicious submissions, we would also request device logs in order to determine other relevant information about potential attackers exploiting vulnerabilities in Mail and other vulnerabilities on the device.

Please note: Not every email that causes the symptoms above and shared with us will qualify for a bounty as there could be other bugs in MobileMail/maild – we’re only looking for ones that contain an attack.

How to send the emails using Outlook :

  1. Open Outlook from a computer and locate the relevant email
  2. Select Actions => Other Actions => View Source
  3. And send the source to [email protected]cops.org

How to send the suspicious email via Gmail:

  1. Locate and select the relevant message
  2. Click on the three dots “… “ in the menu and click on Forward as an attachment
  3. Send the email with the “.eml” attachment to [email protected]

* Please note that we haven’t published all details intentionally. This bug is still unpatched and we want to avoid further misuse of this bug

  • There are no more articles
❌